C1 self-scoring rubric for final drafts
C1A practical scoring rubric to evaluate coherence, argument quality, and language control.
How to use this rubric
After writing a full draft, score each category from 1 to 5.
Then revise the two lowest categories first.
Category 1: Task fulfillment
- 5: Fully addresses the task, scope, and audience.
- 3: Addresses the topic but leaves parts underdeveloped.
- 1: Partial or unclear response to the task.
Category 2: Structure and coherence
- 5: Paragraph progression is logical and purposeful.
- 3: Overall structure is visible but uneven.
- 1: Paragraphs feel disconnected or repetitive.
Category 3: Argument quality
- 5: Claims are supported, nuanced, and evaluated.
- 3: Some support present, but analysis remains surface-level.
- 1: Mostly assertions without meaningful support.
Category 4: Language range and precision
- 5: Precise lexical choices and controlled variation.
- 3: Adequate range with noticeable vagueness.
- 1: Limited range and frequent imprecision.
Category 5: Accuracy and style control
- 5: High grammatical control with appropriate register.
- 3: Errors present but meaning remains clear.
- 1: Frequent errors reduce clarity.
Revision protocol after scoring
- Rewrite thesis and topic sentences for clarity.
- Strengthen weak paragraphs with evidence and consequences.
- Remove redundancy and sharpen word choice.
- Recheck register consistency.
Writing tip
Self-scoring is most useful when it leads to targeted revision.
Score -> diagnose -> edit -> rescore.