C1 self-scoring rubric for final drafts

C1

A practical scoring rubric to evaluate coherence, argument quality, and language control.

How to use this rubric

After writing a full draft, score each category from 1 to 5.
Then revise the two lowest categories first.

Category 1: Task fulfillment

  • 5: Fully addresses the task, scope, and audience.
  • 3: Addresses the topic but leaves parts underdeveloped.
  • 1: Partial or unclear response to the task.

Category 2: Structure and coherence

  • 5: Paragraph progression is logical and purposeful.
  • 3: Overall structure is visible but uneven.
  • 1: Paragraphs feel disconnected or repetitive.

Category 3: Argument quality

  • 5: Claims are supported, nuanced, and evaluated.
  • 3: Some support present, but analysis remains surface-level.
  • 1: Mostly assertions without meaningful support.

Category 4: Language range and precision

  • 5: Precise lexical choices and controlled variation.
  • 3: Adequate range with noticeable vagueness.
  • 1: Limited range and frequent imprecision.

Category 5: Accuracy and style control

  • 5: High grammatical control with appropriate register.
  • 3: Errors present but meaning remains clear.
  • 1: Frequent errors reduce clarity.

Revision protocol after scoring

  1. Rewrite thesis and topic sentences for clarity.
  2. Strengthen weak paragraphs with evidence and consequences.
  3. Remove redundancy and sharpen word choice.
  4. Recheck register consistency.

Writing tip

Self-scoring is most useful when it leads to targeted revision.
Score -> diagnose -> edit -> rescore.